Published April 23, 2024, 7:34 p.m. ET
In what seems to become a recurring theme of counterproductive legislation, New York lawmakers are making headlines again for policies that ostensibly aim to help workers but end up creating more problems than they solve. The latest saga involves a set of policies impacting app-based food delivery drivers in New York City.
In June of the previous year, the City Council enacted a law that requires app-based food delivery services to pay their drivers a minimum hourly wage of $17.96. The move, lauded by some as a step towards fair labor practices, has instead led to a significant upheaval within the gig economy’s delivery sector.
Companies such as UberEats have been grappling with the new pay regulations, attempting to recalibrate their business models to absorb the added costs without sinking under the financial weight. This recalibration has included reducing the number of drivers on the road at any given time and prioritizing those drivers who log the most hours, leaving casual gig workers in the cold.
Additionally, to counterbalance the increased labor costs, UberEats, DoorDash, and similar services have been forced to pass on these costs to consumers in the form of higher delivery fees. Part of this strategy also entailed altering their tipping policies, allowing customers to decide on tips after delivery – a move that has seen drivers’ earnings from gratuities drop significantly.
The restructuring has not only led to reduced earnings for drivers through fewer shifts and lower tips but has also outpriced many consumers from using these delivery services frequently. As the number of orders decreases, so too does the available work for drivers, creating a counterintuitive situation where regulations intended to increase earnings lead to reduced hours and pay.
Seattle has witnessed a similar fallout, underscoring the broader implications of such regulatory interventions on gig economy dynamics.
The issue is further complicated by new legislation introduced by City Councilman Shaun Abreu (D-Manhattan). In what appears to be a misguided effort to counteract the perceived retaliatory policies of the app-based delivery services, Abreu is pushing for a bill that would mandate these apps to prompt users to tip before delivery and suggest a minimum tip amount. This move is likely to exacerbate the current dilemma by further disincentivizing customer orders due to increased upfront costs, thus reducing the demand for drivers even more.
Abreu’s proposals, while arguably well-intentioned, fail to address the core issues at play and seem to disregard the complex ecosystem of the gig economy. This legislative approach, rather than benefiting gig workers, might serve to further undercut their earning potential and jeopardize their employment.
The unfolding scenario is a classic case of regulatory intentions clashing with market realities, resulting in unintended consequences that harm the very individuals the laws aim to protect. Instead of doubling down on policies that have already shown problematic outcomes, lawmakers might need to reconsider their strategy and perhaps look towards more sustainable solutions that do not inadvertently harm those they intend to help.
Source