An Indian-origin data scientist who was employed at TD Bank in Canada has been dismissed following a storm of criticism on social media after he shared a video in which he discussed how he exploited food banks designed to aid students to obtain “free food.” In the video, the individual, identified as Mehul Prajapati, boasted about saving “hundreds of bucks” each month by accessing food intended for those in financial need.
In the controversial video, which was initially posted on Instagram but later went viral on the microblogging platform X, Prajapati detailed his method of obtaining groceries from food banks located on college and university campuses. These food banks, operated by charities, are established to provide essential food items to low-income families and students confronting financial hardships. He claimed this strategy allowed him to significantly cut down his grocery expenses.
Showcasing a week’s worth of food including fruits, vegetables, bread, and canned goods that he had acquired from these food banks, Prajapati drew severe online criticism. The public outrage grew especially acute upon the revelation that Prajapati’s annual salary as a data scientist at TD Bank was reportedly around 98,000 Canadian dollars, a sum suggesting that he was far from the intended demographic of food bank users.
Responding to the widespread backlash and the unethical nature of Prajapati’s actions, TD Bank announced that he was no longer employed at the bank. The announcement came after an X user shared the video, criticizing Prajapati for his behavior, leading to it being widely circulated and discussed on social platforms. The original post, along with the account that had shared the video on Instagram, was deleted following the backlash.
Prajapati’s actions sparked a broader debate on social media regarding the ethics and legality of exploiting charitable resources. Some users highlighted that food banks operate on an honor system and rely on individual integrity, lamenting that individuals like Prajapati abuse this trust. Questions were raised about the legality of his actions, with some wondering if this could be considered a form of felony given that he was financially well-off.
Despite the overwhelming condemnation, a few voices on social media expressed sympathy for Prajapati following his firing. They raised concerns about his future, particularly in relation to his immigration status, and debated whether the punishment fit the transgression. Others brought attention to the issue of food waste, suggesting that the focus should also be on the systemic issue of food distribution and waste rather than solely on individuals’ actions.
This incident has ignited a conversation about ethical behavior, the role of charity in society, and the responsibilities of individuals who find themselves in positions of relative privilege. The public response underscores a collective expectation for ethical conduct and the importance of resources meant for the vulnerable being used as intended.
Source